For example, there should be an automatic way of saving reports." "You really need a technical team in order to really utilize the product." "The reports in Apache JMeter could improve." Currently, there is not enough automation involved with the feature. There are some tools, but it would be nice if official standard tools and procedures are available." "The solution needs to improve reporting. It would be nice if Apache can provide some standard tools and procedures for integration with CI/CD tools like DPR. Currently, people are using their own customized tools. They can also focus more on integration with CI/CD. They can also improve it on the reporting side in terms of the comparison of the reports. In terms of reporting, runtime monitoring is not currently included, and it should be included. We struggled with it during the distribution.
That is because there are so many different uses and different unique environments and setups for it, but I remember thinking a few times that if they only just said this." "They can improve it a little bit in terms of distribution load testing. In the cases that I can think of, I was looking for a rather hand-holding approach with Step A, B, and C, but then I realized that with a product that is open source like this, you can't do handholding. There's no automation." "I sometimes found the documentation to be not as explanatory as I would've liked it. It doesn't utilize an automatic session management mechanism or methods other tools use like parsing cookies and variables. The fundamental reporting mechanisms need to be drastically improved. "It has some proxy-based dependencies which require specific proxies to be set up or disabled, which causes problems." "We're like the solution to be more user-friendly." "JMeter's reporting is extremely rudimentary. More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pros → The protocols that are available are widely varied when compared to other performance testing tools." The existing performance testing that this tool is capable of is good. You can use the insights in the Performance Center of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise to address or test URLs that usually take up much time." "One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this." "It offers easy integration with third-party tools like Dynatrace, Splunk, etc." "Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise supports a lot of technologies. The solution also has the latest features, for example, networkability, where it can, within the UI, follow the waterfall model. I also like that Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is the only tool you can utilize for all your needs, even for different protocols and scripting. For example, in the past, you can't see the changes when you upload scripts into the Performance Center, but now, it has that visibility, so whenever you want, you can change the script in the Performance Center. I also like that the solution is user-friendly, especially in terms of making specific changes. Enterprise-level testing is something that we are satisfied with." "The product is good, and the concept is good as well." "The user interface is fine." "What I like most in Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is the comparison between two different exhibitions which gives value to my company. The technology supports that and enables us to have a wider range of testing. "I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting." "We have a centralized delivery team and we are able to meet enterprise requirements, which include different types of protocols that are involved, including scripting.
0 kommentar(er)
